Am. Nelson et al., A CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF THE WHO AND CDC CASE DEFINITIONS FOR AIDS IN KINSHASA, ZAIRE - IS PASSIVE SURVEILLANCE VALID, AIDS, 7(9), 1993, pp. 1241-1245
Objectives: To compare the specificity of the World Health Organizatio
n (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) case defi
nitions for AIDS in autopsy cases from Zaire. Setting: Mama Yemo Hospi
tal and University Hospital morgues in Kinshasa, and Karawa Hospital i
n Equateur Region, Zaire. Methods: Autopsy cases with a clinical diagn
osis of AIDS on the death certificate or chart were studied. Evaluatio
n included post-mortem HIV-1 serology, chart review for specific AIDS-
related symptoms and signs, and application of WHO and CDC case criter
ia to the clinical and autopsy diagnoses. Results: Of the 68 diagnosed
AIDS cases, 98% fulfilled WHO criteria for AIDS and 93% fulfilled bot
h WHO and CDC criteria. All cases fulfilling both criteria were HIV-1-
seropositive. Opportunistic infections accounted for 84% of CDC AIDS-d
efining conditions. Disseminated tuberculosis was the most frequent (4
1%) specific diagnosis; Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia was rare (<2%).
Conclusions: There was good concordance between WHO and CDC case defi
nitions. A diagnosis of AIDS on the chart or death certificate is adeq
uate for surveillance purposes in this population.