F. Bootz et al., FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AND SURVIVAL RATES OF PATIENTS WITH CANCER OF THE ORAL CAVITY AND OROPHARYNX AFTER RECONSTRUCTION WITH RADIAL FOREARM FLAP, HNO. Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenarzte, 41(8), 1993, pp. 380-384
In tumor surgery of the oral cavity and oropharynx function and qualit
y of life should be maintained and large resection margins to avoid re
currences. For these purposes the radial forearm flap has proved to be
a versatile tissue transfer since it is thin and pliable and has a lo
ng vascular pedicle. From 1987 to 1991 we used the radial forearm flap
in performing 70 reconstructions of the oral cavity and oropharynx af
ter resection of squamous cell carcinomas. Forty-six patients had carc
inomas of the oropharynx, while 24 patients had carcinomas of the oral
cavity. The indications for these reconstructions were tumors of the
oral cavity and oropharynx greater than T2 which after resection were
not suitable for primary closure of the defect. Thirty-seven patients
died during the follow-up period, with 36% dying within the first 2 ye
ars after operation. Fifty-five percent of these patients died of recu
rrences, 17% of metastases and 11% of intercurrent diseases. In 17% of
cases the cause of death was unknown. The 2-year survival probability
was 52% (Kaplan Meier). Our results show that reconstructions with th
e radial forearm flap do not improve survival rates when compared to t
he general survival rate in these cases despite a possibly larger rese
ction margin allowing a more radical tumor resection. Thirty-one of th
e 33 patients still alive underwent following examinations. Forty-six
percent of the patients with tumors of the oropharynx and 57% of the p
atients with tumors of the oral cavity had severe difficulties in swal
lowing. Speech function was reduced in 46% of the patients with oropha
ryngeal tumors and in all patients with tumors of the oral cavity. Res
piration was slightly altered in 29% of patients with tumors of the or
opharynx and in 14% of patients with tumors of the oral cavity. These
problems in many cases were also due to some extent to postoperative r
adiotherapy. Despite the unchanged survival rates compared to patients
without reconstructions and limited functional results, we still reco
mmend the radial forearm flap as an adequate reconstructive method wit
h low donor morbidity. The best indication in our opinion is reconstru
ction of the soft palate and lateral wall of the oropharynx whereas pr
oblems may occur in reconstruction of the anterior part of the tongue
and floor of mouth. In these cases very often significantly reduced mo
bility of the tongue results.