Mc. Oz et al., BRIDGE EXPERIENCE WITH LONG-TERM IMPLANTABLE LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES - ARE THEY AN ALTERNATIVE TO TRANSPLANTATION, Circulation, 95(7), 1997, pp. 1844-1852
Background If long-term use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs)
as bridges to transplantation is successful, the issue of permanent d
evice implantation in lieu of transplantation could be addressed throu
gh the creation of appropriately designed trials. Our medium-term expe
rience with both pneumatically and electrically powered ThermoCardiosy
stems LVADs is presented to outline the benefits and limitations of de
vice support in lieu of transplantation. Methods and Results Detailed
records were kept prospectively for all patients undergoing LVAD inser
tion. Fifty-eight LVADs were inserted over 5 years, with a survival ra
te of 74%. Mean patient age was 50 years, and duration of support aver
aged 98 days. Although common, both preexisting infection and infectio
n during LVAD support were not associated with increased mortality or
decreased rate of successful transplantation. Thromboembolic complicat
ions were rare, occurring in only three patients (5%) despite the abse
nce of anticoagulation. Ventricular arrhythmias were well tolerated in
all patients except in cases of early perioperative right ventricular
failure, with no deaths. Right ventricular failure occurred in ode th
ird of patients and was managed in a small percentage by right ventric
ular assist device (RVAD) support and/or inhaled nitric oxide therapy.
There were no serious device malfunctions, but five graft-related hem
orrhages resulted in two deaths. Finally, a variety of noncardiac surg
ical procedures were performed in LVAD recipients, with no major morbi
dity and mortality. Conclusions Over all, our medium-term experience w
ith implantable LVAD support is encouraging. Although additional areas
of investigation exist, improvements in patient selection and managem
ent together with device alterations that have reduced the thromboembo
lic incidence and facilitated patient rehabilitation lead us to believ
e that a prospective, randomized trial is indicated to study the role
that LVADs may have as an alternative to medical management.