P. Scanlon et al., PATIENT RESPONSE TO LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL OR THIOPENTONE, Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 40(9), 1993, pp. 816-818
The response to insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) following
either propofol 2.5 mg . kg-1 or thiopentone 5 mg . kg-1 was assessed
in two groups of patients. The purpose of the study was to ascertain
which of these two induction agents provided the better conditions for
insertion of the LMA. Anaesthesia was induced by propofol in 35 patie
nts and by thiopentone in 37 Following induction, ventilation was assi
sted for two minutes using 50% oxygen and nitrous oxide and 2% isoflur
ane, before insertion of the LMA. The presence of gagging, coughing, l
aryngospasm and movement was noted and graded. Thiopentone was associa
ted with an adverse response in 76% of patients, compared with propofo
l in 26% (P < 0.01). Gagging, laryngospasm and head movement were more
common using thiopentone (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05 respectivel
y) and in 11% (P < 0.05) of the thiopentone group insertion of the LMA
was impossible due to inadequate relaxation. We conclude that, using
these doses, propofol is superior to thiopentone as an induction agent
for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway.