EVALUATION OF THE VMM TURBINE FOR SPIROMETRY IN THE APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY LABORATORY

Citation
Wdf. Smith et al., EVALUATION OF THE VMM TURBINE FOR SPIROMETRY IN THE APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY LABORATORY, Canadian journal of applied physiology, 18(3), 1993, pp. 317-324
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Sport Sciences
ISSN journal
10667814
Volume
18
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
317 - 324
Database
ISI
SICI code
1066-7814(1993)18:3<317:EOTVTF>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The volume measurement module turbine (VMM) was evaluated in 51 subjec ts for spirometry in applied physiology against the Stead-Wells spirom eter (SW) and Wright peak flow meter (WM). The volume and flow ranges (VMM) were, FEV1 1.32 to 3.94 L (mean 2.62, confidence interval [CI] 2 .46 to 2.78); forced vital capacity (FVC) 1.97 to 5.06 L (mean 3.50, C I 3.29 to 3.71); and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) 290 to 624 L.min -1 (mean 434, CI 407 to 461). The mean difference for FEV1 was 0.09 L (CI 0.05 to. 0.14), FVC 0.04 L (CI -0.02 to 0.10), and PEFR 18.0 L min -1 (CI 8.7 to 27.3) less than SW or WM. Bias with FEV1 and FVC was not significant, though PEFR demonstrated a significant proportional erro r. The repeatability coefficients for FEV1 and FVC were 0.18 and 0.20, comparable to the SW; but for PEFR they were greater, 58.4 versus 33. 8 L.min-1 by WM. The VMM turbine is accurate and reliable for the meas urement of FEV1 and FVC over the ranges studied; however, care should be taken when interpreting PEFR.