Pa. Gooding et al., PRESERVED PATTERN COMPLETION PRIMING FOR NOVEL, ABSTRACT GEOMETRIC SHAPES IN AMNESICS OF SEVERAL ETIOLOGIES, Neuropsychologia, 31(8), 1993, pp. 789-810
Two experiments were conducted using a paradigm developed by GABRIELI
et al., Neuropsychologia 28, 417-427, 1990, which assessed both indire
ct and direct memory performance in a completion task for novel abstra
ct geometric patterns. The preferred method of scoring was the lines m
ethod, based on the number of correct and incorrect lines produced for
each item. It was chosen because it is both the simplest and the most
informative measure. Two methods of scoring were used in previous wor
k, namely, the strict whole figure method and the lenient whole figure
method (GABRIELLI et al., 1990: VERFAELIE et al., Brain Cognit. 18, 3
4-45. 1992). Therefore to facilitate comparisons between studies and t
o determine the characteristics of different scoring methods, results
with all three measures were included. In Experiment 1, two different
encoding strategies of naming and copying were used in order to explor
e the relationship between indirect and direct memory performance. Ind
irect memory performance in the naming condition was at baseline where
as in the copying condition it was significantly above baseline. Cued
recall did not differ across encoding conditions but recognition was h
igher in the naming condition than the copying condition. In Experimen
t 2, an attempt was made to extend the findings of two studies, one wi
th H.M. (GABRIELLI et al., 1990) and one with nine Korsakoffs (VERFAFL
IE et al., 1992), to a larger group of 14 amnesics of several aetiolog
ies. Indirect memory performance was found to be equivalent for the am
nesics and their matched controls, only when the lenient and the lines
methods of scoring were used. Recognition and cued recall performance
was impaired for the amnesics compared to the controls.