Js. Brown et al., GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS AS PROVIDERS OF MINOR SURGERY - A SUCCESS STORY, British journal of general practice, 47(417), 1997, pp. 205-210
Background. It is now recognized that many minor surgical procedures c
an be appropriately performed in a general practitioner setting; the g
overnment has introduced a list of minor operations, for which it is p
repared to pay a limited fee, and it is now time to see whether this s
ervice can be expanded. Aim. To demonstrate that a group of general pr
actitioners (GPs) with a particular interest in minor surgery can offe
r an expanded service both to their own patients and also to the patie
nts of neighbouring colleagues, whether fundholding or non-fundholding
, within a health authority area. Method. The West Kent Health Authori
ty awarded a contract for 500 minor operations to a group practice of
five GPs. At the end of the first year, 511 operations had been perfor
med and the results and implications are discussed. Results. The targe
t of 500 minor operations was met and passed in the first year. Thirty
-five neighbouring GPs referred their patients directly. All were offe
red an initial appointment within one week and had their operation per
formed within one month, unless they had expressed a preference for an
alternative date. Several unsuspected malignancies were discovered -
no complications were recorded, patients' and referring doctors' satis
faction was high and the scheme was judged to have been a success in t
heir eyes. Conclusion. GPs can provide an efficient, cost-effective mi
nor surgery service, which is popular with patients and referring coll
eagues. Whether this is the way we wish to organize minor surgery in t
he future needs further discussion.