INTERLABORATORY HISTOPATHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF ALZHEIMER NEUROPATHOLOGY - DIFFERENT METHODOLOGIES YIELD COMPARABLE DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS

Citation
Dw. Mckeel et al., INTERLABORATORY HISTOPATHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF ALZHEIMER NEUROPATHOLOGY - DIFFERENT METHODOLOGIES YIELD COMPARABLE DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders, 7(3), 1993, pp. 136-151
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,Pathology
ISSN journal
08930341
Volume
7
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
136 - 151
Database
ISI
SICI code
0893-0341(1993)7:3<136:IHAOAN>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Three investigators have applied different histopathologic methods (mo dified Bielschowsky silver methods, Congo red-gallocyanin) to differen tiate Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n = 7 subjects; four with very mild de mentia and three with moderate to advanced dementia) neuropathology fr om brain changes associated with aging in three nondemented individual s who had been evaluated using a validated dementia severity staging i nstrument [Washington University clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)] gener ally within a year of death. The presence of elevated numbers of neoco rtical (frontal and temporal) diffuse, mature, and total senile plaque s (SP) was strongly correlated with the presence of clinical AD but di d not equate with CDR dementia severity. Neocortical neurofibrillary t angle (NFT) density as well as hippocampal NFT and SP density in this small series did not differentiate statistically between AD and contro ls. NFT density appeared to correlate with CDR better than SP density. Quantitative histopathologic assessment of AD markers in only a few b rain regions can accurately predict the presence of clinical AD, inclu ding the very mild form of the disease. This is especially true for SP in the neocortex.