This study examined the reliability and convergent validity of three m
ethods of peer and supervisory ratings of the effectiveness of individ
ual NASA astronauts and their relationships with flight assignments. T
hese two techniques were found to be reliable and relatively convergen
t. Seniority and a peer-rated Performance and Competence factor proved
to be most closely associated with flight assignments, while supervis
or ratings and a peer-rated Group Living and Personality factor were f
ound to be unrelated. Results have implications for the selection and
training of astronauts.