Cj. Lintott et al., TREATING HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA WITH HMG-COA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS - A DIRECT COMPARISON OF SIMVASTATIN AND PRAVASTATIN, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 23(4), 1993, pp. 381-386
Background: Simvastatin and pravastatin are both competitive inhibitor
s of the rate limiting enzyme for cholesterol biosynthesis (HMG CoA) r
eductase, but data from individual clinical trials suggest significant
differences in potency for cholesterol reduction between the two drug
s. Aim: To assess any differences in efficacy and safety between simva
statin and pravastatin in a direct, comparative study. Methods: A doub
le-blind, double-dummy, randomised study design was used, involving 48
patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Following a 6 week place
bo baseline period, patients were randomly allocated to treatment with
either simvastatin or pravastatin, commencing at a dose of 10 mg dail
y. The dose levels were titrated up to the recommended maximum effecti
ve dose of 40 mg daily at 6 weekly intervals if LDL cholesterol levels
remained greater-than-or-equal-to 3.4 mmol/L. After 18 weeks of thera
py, all patients were transferred to simvastatin therapy for a further
6 weeks, continuing at their week 18 dose level. Patients complied wi
th a standard lipid lowering diet (containing <30% of energy as total
fat) throughout the study period. Results: Over the 18-week direct com
parison of the two drugs, there was a significant difference (p<0.001)
in response between simvastatin and pravastatin for reduction in leve
ls of total cholesterol (32%vs21% respectively), LDL cholesterol (38%v
s27%) and apolipoprotein B levels (34%vs23%). No significant differenc
e in drug effect was seen for the small reduction in levels of apolipo
protein AI (5%vs6% respectively), nor for the increased levels of apol
ipoprotein AII (14%vs11%) and HDL cholesterol (11%vs7%). Lp(a) levels
remained unchanged. When pravastatin was replaced with simvastatin for
the final 6 weeks of the study in the 23 patients initially randomise
d to pravastatin, there were further reductions (p < 0.01) in total an
d LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B. These results establish the a
dvantage of simvastatin over pravastatin in terms of efficacy, for the
treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.