Wg. Barsan et al., SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-DOSE NARCOTIC ANALGESIA FOR EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES, Annals of emergency medicine, 22(9), 1993, pp. 1444-1449
Study objective: To evaluate the safety of high-dose IV narcotics in p
atients requiring analgesia for painful emergency department procedure
s. Design: Prospective multicenter clinical trial. Setting: Five adult
urban EDs. Methods and measurements: All patients received IV meperid
ine (1.5 to 3.0 mg/kg) titrated to analgesia followed by a painful pro
cedure. Vital signs and alertness scale were recorded at regular inter
vals, and patients were observed for four hours. Adverse events were m
onitored and documented. Comparisons between baseline and postanalgesi
a intervals were made with a repeated measures ANOVA (Dunnett's test),
Results: Although statistically significant changes in vital signs an
d alertness scale occurred, they were not clinically significant. Opia
te reversal with naloxone was not needed in any patient, and no signif
icant respiratory or circulatory compromise occurred. Conclusion: This
study of 72 patients demonstrates that high-dose narcotic analgesia i
s appropriate, well tolerated, and safe when used in selected patients
before painful procedures in the ED. Narcotic antagonists and resusci
tation equipment nonetheless should be available to maximize safety.