Is. Laird et al., A SURVEY ON THE USE AND NONUSE OF RESPIRATORY PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT INWORKPLACES IN A PROVINCIAL NEW-ZEALAND CITY, The Annals of occupational hygiene, 37(4), 1993, pp. 367-375
A survey by self-administered questionnaire of the extent of use of re
spiratory protective devices (respirators) was undertaken in various i
ndustries in a provincial centre in New Zealand. The population was de
rived from a register of premises compiled by the Occupational Safety
and Health Service of the Department of Labour. Of the airborne contam
inants encountered by the respondents (N = 81), exposure to dusts was
most common (40%), followed by vapours (33%) and gases or fumes (27%).
Knowledge of the health effects of exposure to the hazards was varied
; most respondents indicated that exposure affected the respiratory sy
stem (42%). The most common form of respirator worn in the industries
surveyed was the air-purifying type (73%), including ori-nasal masks w
ith cartridges (43%) and disposable dust masks (30%). The predominant
type of work undertaken when wearing respirators was handling and mixi
ng of chemicals (19%), sanding and grinding (16%), and spraying chemic
als (16%) and applying agricultural chemicals (20%). Nearly two-thirds
of the respondents stated that they removed the respirator for some r
eason before completing the work that required its use. The most commo
n reasons for removing the respirator were that it felt too hot (28%),
or that the wearer experienced difficulty in breathing (19%) or in se
eing adequately (19%). Those respondents who indicated that they alway
s wore a respirator gave as their reason their concern for their own h
ealth. Nearly half (49%) of the respondents indicated that they had re
ceived no advice on using, fitting or maintaining the respirator.