W. Cates et al., ATYPICAL PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE - CAN WE IDENTIFY CLINICAL PREDICTORS, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 169(2), 1993, pp. 341-346
OBJECTIVE: We used data from a large multicenter case-control study of
tubal infertility to analyze further the relationship among demograph
ic variables, behavioral measures, history of previous sexually transm
itted diseases, and past contraceptive practices, for women with and w
ithout a history of pelvic inflammatory disease. STUDY DESIGN: We iden
tified 283 white women with tubal infertility who requested rare at se
ven participating institutions. Of these women, 238 (84%) did not have
a history of pelvic inflammatory disease (''atypical pelvic inflammat
ory disease'') whereas 45 reported a history of pelvic inflammatory di
sease (''overt pelvic inflammatory disease''). We compared these group
s with 1629 white women without a history of either infertility or pel
vic inflammatory disease who were delivered of their first live-born c
hild at the same institutions as the infertile cases. RESULTS: Women w
ith atypical pelvic inflammatory disease were demographically more lik
e fertile control subjects and had behavioral characteristics midway b
etween those of the overt pelvic inflammatory disease group and the fe
rtile group. Both oral contraceptive and diaphragm use protected again
st tubal infertility for women with either atypical or overt pelvic in
flammatory disease. Atypical pelvic inflammatory disease was related t
o a history of Trichomonas infection but not to a reported history of
gonorrhea, genital herpes, or other vaginitis. CONCLUSION: Atypical pe
lvic inflammatory disease is probably more common than its symptomatic
counterpart. Whereas this condition is associated with some character
istics of a sexually transmitted infection, clinical predictors remain
elusive.