Rg. Gish et al., LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION FOR PATIENTS WITH ALCOHOLISM AND END-STAGE LIVER-DISEASE, The American journal of gastroenterology, 88(9), 1993, pp. 1337-1342
Liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis remains controversial. I
n particular, criteria for the selection of patients who will remain r
ecovered from alcoholism post-transplant require better definition. We
analyzed the long-term predictive value of categorizing transplant re
ferral patients with alcoholism and end-stage liver disease into risk
groups for recidivism and noncompliance. Forty-seven patients with the
diagnosis of alcoholism and advanced liver disease were evaluated and
placed into predefined risk groups (low-, moderate-, and high-risk) f
or recidivism and noncompliance. No absolute period of abstinence from
alcohol was required. All patients were asked to sign a contract not
to drink alcohol and comply with a rehabilitation program before and a
fter transplantation. Compliance with alcohol rehabilitation, abstinen
ce, functional level, employment, and survival were assessed. Patients
who were not compliant with the rehabilitation program or consumed al
cohol were scored as failures. Thirty-one patients were ranked as low
risk, and were accepted for liver transplantation; 27 patients were tr
ansplanted. Five of 31 patients (16%) drank alcohol. One patient drank
before and four patients drank transiently after transplantation. Ten
patients were categorized as moderate risk, and were deferred for tra
nsplantation; two patients underwent later transplantation. All 10 pat
ients (100%) were noncompliant or drank alcohol, including two patient
s who drank after transplantation after a period of abstinence and reh
abilitation. Six patients were ranked as high risk, and were denied li
ver transplantation. Five patients (83%) drank alcohol and were noncom
pliant. Minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean, 24 months; range, 12-41
months). The mean Karnofsky performance score was 34 before and 84 af
ter liver transplantation. Actuarial survival of alcoholic patients un
dergoing transplantation was 93%. We conclude that categorization of t
ransplant referral patients with alcoholism and liver failure into pre
defined risk groups for recidivism and noncompliance accurately predic
ts pre- and post-transplant behavior. As defined, only low-risk alcoho
lic patients are good candidates for liver transplantation.