In a study of the Dutch publication output in physics we tested method
s of delimitating fields by journal categories in the Science Citation
Index (SCI) compared to the classification of individual publications
into subfields in the subject specific database Physics Briefs (PHYS)
. Different methods of measuring national scientific output were compa
red as well. In this paper we report the main findings on these issues
, based on a study of six selected subfields in physics. The main conc
lusion with respect to the use of different classification methods is
that in most of the selected fields in physics the method which delimi
tates fields by journal categories yields an incomplete picture of the
output of a country. Particularly because this method neglects a cons
iderable number of articles published in general journals. With respec
t to different methods of counting publications it was corroborated by
the Dutch data in Physics briefs that: 1. so-called 'integer counted'
world shares are very much influenced by the degree of 'international
isation' and 2. 'first author counting' gives a satisfactory approxima
tion of 'fractional counting'. Citation indicators based on 'first aut
hor counting', however, may be distorted in fields with a large fracti
on of international co-authored publications.