A significant problem in assessing the relative relevance of nicotine
and tar yield for compensatory smoking after switching from high to lo
w yield cigarettes is that nicotine and tar yield are highly intercorr
elated across conventional cigarettes and that the tar/nicotine ratios
vary only within a modest range. A better differentiation between the
impacts of nicotine and tar yield was expected by comparing in a labo
ratory experiment a new low nicotine/medium tar cigarette (''Next'') w
ith conventional low nicotine/low tar (ultra-light) cigarettes and wit
h medium nicotine/medium tar cigarettes with respect to nicotine absor
ption and physiological effects. Twelve females, habitually smoking me
dium type cigarettes (greater-than-or-equal-to 0.7 mg nicotine) partic
ipated in the study. Neither the number of cigarettes smoked under fie
ld conditions nor the puffing behavior during the laboratory experimen
t differed between the three types of cigarettes. In the laboratory, N
ext produced only very small increases in plasma nicotine and changes
in cardiovascular or EEG measures, whereas the effects of the medium c
igarettes were in the expected range and those of the ultra-light ciga
rettes about halfway in between. The nicotine absorption/nicotine yiel
d and the CO absorption/CO yield ratios were similar for Next and the
habitual cigarettes, but about twofold higher for the ultra-light ciga
rettes. This suggests that gustatory and olfactory sensations, which a
re supposed to be more dependent on tar than on nicotine yield, may pl
ay a greater role for the regulation of smoking behavior than hitherto
believed.