Sj. Schapiro et Al. Kessel, WEIGHT-GAIN AMONG JUVENILE RHESUS MACAQUES - A COMPARISON OF ENRICHEDAND CONTROL-GROUPS, Laboratory animal science, 43(4), 1993, pp. 315-318
Environmental enrichment techniques for captive primates are aimed at
improving their psychological well-being. While behavioral variables a
re used to measure changes in psychological well-being, physiologic me
asures (e.g., heart rate, cortisol response) are sometimes gathered in
addition to the behavioral evidence. Some of these physiologic indice
s measure acute changes in the animals' well-being, limiting their use
fulness. Body weight, however, is a measure of physical well-being tha
t may have meaning as a long-term indicator of psychological well-bein
g. We therefore collected body weight data from two groups of rhesus m
acaques (Macaca mulatta group 1: n = 34, group 2: n = 30) every 8 week
s beginning at the age of 1 year, as they passed through various housi
ng conditions as part of a program to develop a specific pathogen-free
breeding colony. One-half of the subjects in each group received a va
riety of environmental enhancements during all housing conditions; the
other half received no enrichment and served as controls. At the begi
nning of the study (age 1 year), control and enriched subjects did not
differ in body weight. Among group-1 subjects, enriched animals weigh
ed significantly more than controls after 4 months of enrichment, and
the weight difference was maintained 24 months later. Enriched animals
in group 2 never differed in weight from their controls. The order in
which different types of enrichment were presented and the extra-cage
environment of the two groups differed, which may account for this di
screpancy. Group-1 enriched subjects were the only animals that weighe
d as much as free-ranging rhesus monkeys, and rates of weight gain amo
ng all groups of subjects were similar to several populations maintain
ed under more naturalistic conditions.