SOME CONSIDERATIONS IN EVALUATING SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION BY NORMAL-HEARING, NOISE-MASKED NORMAL-HEARING, AND COCHLEAR IMPLANT LISTENERS .1. THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE FORMAT
Ms. Sommers et al., SOME CONSIDERATIONS IN EVALUATING SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION BY NORMAL-HEARING, NOISE-MASKED NORMAL-HEARING, AND COCHLEAR IMPLANT LISTENERS .1. THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE FORMAT, Ear and hearing, 18(2), 1997, pp. 89-99
Objective: The purpose of the present studies was to assess the validi
ty of using closed-set response formats to measure two cognitive proce
sses essential for recognizing spoken words-perceptual normalization (
the ability to accommodate acoustic-phonetic variability) and lexical
discrimination (the ability to isolate words in the mental lexicon). I
n addition, the experiments were designed to examine the effects of re
sponse format on evaluation of these two abilities in normal-hearing (
NH), noise-masked normal-hearing (NMNH), and cochlear implant (CI) sub
ject populations. Design: The speech recognition performance of NH, NM
NH, and CI listeners was measured using both open- and closed-set resp
onse formats under a number of experimental conditions. To assess talk
er normalization abilities, identification scores for words produced b
y a single talker were compared with recognition performance for items
produced by multiple talkers. To examine lexical discrimination, perf
ormance for words that are phonetically similar to many other words (h
ard words) was compared with scores for items with few phonetically si
milar competitors (easy words). Results: Open-set word identification
for all subjects was significantly poorer when stimuli were produced i
n lists with multiple talkers compared with conditions in which all of
the words were spoken by a single talker. Open-set word recognition a
lso was better for lexically easy compared with lexically hard words.
Closed-set tests, in contrast, failed to reveal the effects of either
talker variability or lexical difficulty even when the response altern
atives provided were systematically selected to maximize confusability
with target items. Conclusions: These findings suggest that, although
closed-set tests may provide important information for clinical asses
sment of speech perception, they may not adequately evaluate a number
of cognitive processes that are necessary for recognizing spoken words
. The parallel results obtained across all subject groups indicate tha
t NH, NMNH, and CI listeners engage similar perceptual operations to i
dentify spoken words. Implications of these findings for the design of
new test batteries that can provide comprehensive evaluations of the
individual capacities needed for processing spoken language are discus
sed.