COMPARISON OF APACHE-II, TRAUMA SCORE, AND INJURY SEVERITY SCORE AS PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN CRITICALLY INJURED TRAUMA PATIENTS

Citation
R. Rutledge et al., COMPARISON OF APACHE-II, TRAUMA SCORE, AND INJURY SEVERITY SCORE AS PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN CRITICALLY INJURED TRAUMA PATIENTS, The American journal of surgery, 166(3), 1993, pp. 244-247
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00029610
Volume
166
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
244 - 247
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(1993)166:3<244:COATSA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Trauma Score (TS), APACHE II score, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) ha ve been utilized to quantitate severity of illness in various groups o f patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the relationship of the APACHE II score, TS, and ''computer-derived'' ISS with outcome in critically injured trauma patients. Data were recorded prospectivel y in a computer database for 428 consecutive trauma admissions. Stepwi se discriminate analysis was utilized to determine the best predictor of both intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital outcome. Forty-two pati ents died in the ICU (10%), and another 18 patients died after leaving the ICU (4%), for a total mortality rate of 14%. The mean p value and partial R2 value obtained from stepwise discriminant analysis of the relationships between APACHE II score, TS, and ISS to ICU and hospital survival are shown. APACHE II score was the best predictor of both IC U and hospital outcome in these critically ill trauma patients. Howeve r, when combining all three measures (APACHE II score, TS, and ISS), o nly a portion of the variance in outcome is explained by the scores (R 2 < 0.05). We conclude that scoring systems for outcome prediction sho uld be utilized only as an adjunct to clinical assessment in the evalu ation of the severity of illness and mortality risk in critically ill trauma patients.