Sr. Alexander et al., MANDIBULAR CONDYLE POSITION - COMPARISON OF ARTICULATOR MOUNTINGS ANDMAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 104(3), 1993, pp. 230-239
This study evaluated the reliability of jaw positions, the existence o
f distinct jaw positions, and condyle-disk-fossa relationships in a sy
mptom-free population by using articulator mountings and magnetic reso
nance imaging (MRI). The subjects examined included 28 men, 22 to 35 y
ears of age, all having Angle Class I molar relationships and no disce
rnible TMJ dysfunction. Records taken included the following: an axiog
raphic face-bow to locate retruded hinge axis position, an interocclus
al registration of retruded position (RE), a series of interocclusal r
egistrations for centric occlusion (CO), a leaf gauge-generated centri
c relation (CR), a series of interocclusal registrations for CR, and M
RI. The mandibular position indicator of the SAM articulator (Great La
kes Orthodontics, Ltd., Tonawanda, N.Y.) was used to determine reliabi
lity and existence of distinct jaw positions. Magnetic resonance imagi
ng also evaluated jaw positions and anatomic relationships. The result
s indicate: (1) The articulator analysis of CO and CR is statistically
replicable. (2) A distinct jaw position could be demonstrated for CO
that was separate from RE and CR. It was not possible to discriminate
between RE and CR. (3) Condylar concentricity was observed in half of
the sample and remained consistent in RE, CO, and CR. (4) Of the sampl
e 13% demonstrated anteriorly displaced disks that were not influenced
by posterior condyle placement. (5) The clinical concept of treating
to CR as a preventive measure to improve disk-to-condyle relationships
was not supported by this study.