SOIL-MACROPORE AND LAYER INFLUENCES ON SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASURED WITH BOREHOLE PERMEAMETERS

Citation
L. Wu et al., SOIL-MACROPORE AND LAYER INFLUENCES ON SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASURED WITH BOREHOLE PERMEAMETERS, Soil Science Society of America journal, 57(4), 1993, pp. 917-923
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
ISSN journal
03615995
Volume
57
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
917 - 923
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-5995(1993)57:4<917:SALIOS>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
The borehole permeameter technique can produce erratic saturated hydra ulic conductivity (K(sat) in soils with macropores and abrupt layers b ecause operating theory assumes homogeneous and isotropic conditions. Dye application during an infiltration test demonstrated water movemen t in macropores and erratic K(sat) or matric flux potential (phi(m)). To evaluate the effects or micropores, cracks, and layered soil on K(s at) and phi(m), a finite element solution of the Richards equation was used to simulate infiltration from a borehole (0.03-m radius and 0.50 m deep) with a constant head (H) of 0.05 or 0.10 m. Borehole infiltra tion (for 2 h) was simulated for a Rozetta silt loam (fine-silty, mixe d, mesic Typic Hapludalf) with four configurations: homogeneous, layer ed, a cylindrical macropore centered at the borehole base, and a crack intersecting the borehole wall. Simulated flow rates were increased b y 29% (with H = 0.05 m) and 21% (with H = 0.10 m) when a cylindrical m acropore (4 mm by 0.10 m) was located at the borehole base. Respective increases were 25% (H = 0.05 m) and 20% (H = 0.10 m) when a crack ext ending 0.1 m laterally intersected the borehole wall. Three methods we re tested for calculating K(sat). The simultaneous-equations approach (SEA) using either the Guelph or the Philip model for a homogeneously configured borehole estimated K(sat) within a factor of 2 from input K (sat), but the Laplace analysis method overestimated input K(sat) by a factor of 5 to 12. The fixed alpha value (alpha = K(sat)/phi(m)) meth od with either the Guelph or Philip model estimated K(sat) close to in put K(sat) when a proper alpha value was chosen, but the proper alpha value differed by soil and model. A negative K(sat) was computed using the SEA with the Guelph model when macropores intersected the base of a borehole; negative K(sat) or phi(m) were produced when cylindrical macropores laterally intersected the borehole wall, depending on the v ertical locations of the macropores. Soil with layered hydraulic prope rties also produced unrealistic K(sat).