Jw. Dennis et al., EFFICACY OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS PROPHYLAXIS IN TRAUMA PATIENTS ANDIDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-RISK GROUPS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 35(1), 1993, pp. 132-139
The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and the efficacy of prop
hylactic measures were prospectively evaluated in all patients admitte
d to a level 1 trauma center during 1991. Patients with injury Severit
y Scores (ISS) >9 who survived a minimum of 48 hours (n = 395) were mo
nitored using venous Doppler and ultrasound studies during hospitaliza
tion (total, 1308 studies). Two hundred eighty-one patients (71%) were
randomly assigned to low-dose heparin or sequential compression devic
es. There were 18 cases of lower extremity DVT (4.6%) and four cases (
1.0%) of pulmonary emboli (PE), three of which were fatal. Eight patie
nts (2.9%) on prophylaxis and 10 (8.8%) without prophylaxis developed
DVT (p < 0.02 by Chi-square). There were two PEs in each group. Fourte
en of these 18 patients sustained blunt trauma and included seven spin
al fractures or subluxations (four paraplegic) and four severe head in
juries. This represented 14.0% of 50 patients admitted with spinal inj
uries and 4.3% of 92 patients with severe head injuries. Compared with
those with no neurologic injury (7 of 253 or 2.7%), the risk of DVT i
s significantly higher in the spinal injury patients (p < 0.001, Chi-s
quare) and twice as high as in the head injury group, although not sta
tistically significant (p = 0.4, Chi-square). Three of the four patien
ts with penetrating trauma and DVT had venous injuries. We conclude th
at DVT prophylaxis can significantly reduce the incidence of DVT in tr
auma patients with ISS >9. Patients with severe neurologic injuries (p
articularly spinal cord) are at high risk for DVT and PE and may be co
nsidered for a prophylactic Greenfield filter.