EVALUATION OF LIGHT-SCATTERING DETECTORS FOR SIZE-EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY .1. INSTRUMENT PRECISION AND ACCURACY

Citation
L. Jeng et al., EVALUATION OF LIGHT-SCATTERING DETECTORS FOR SIZE-EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY .1. INSTRUMENT PRECISION AND ACCURACY, Journal of applied polymer science, 49(8), 1993, pp. 1359-1374
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Polymer Sciences
ISSN journal
00218995
Volume
49
Issue
8
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1359 - 1374
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8995(1993)49:8<1359:EOLDFS>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
A systematic evaluation of two types of light-scattering detectors for size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was completed. The two detectors were the low-angle laser light scattering photometer (LALLS) and the m ultiangle laser light-scattering photometer (MALLS). Instrument evalua tions were performed at both room (30-40-degrees-C) and high (135-145- degrees-C) temperatures using the polystyrene standard, NBS 706, at ro om temperature and the polyethylene standard, SRM 1476, at high temper ature. Results of the evaluation showed that when experimental uncerta inties were taken into account LALLS and MALLS demonstrated equivalent precision and accuracy for molecular weight determination. The main s ource of inaccuracy found (particularly for SRM 1476) was the sensitiv ity difference between the light-scattering and the concentration (DRI ) detectors; i.e., the DRI detector was unable to measure very low con centrations of very high molecular weight material present in SRM 1476 , whereas the light-scattering detectors respond strongly. It was show n that for LALLS the overall weight-average molecular weight (M(w)BAR) for the whole polymer calculated using an equation that did not requi re the DRI detector output circumvented this sensitivity problem while assuming that the low angle used was sufficiently close to zero. Use of this equation for MALLS is possible by extrapolating data from all angles used to obtain a light-scattering chromatogram at zero angle. H owever, this possibility was not examined here. A particular advantage of MALLS over LALLS is that MALLS can provide the z-average root mean square radius (commonly referred to here and in other light-scatterin g literature as the ''radius of gyration'') values from the same data as those used to obtain molecular weight values. Although the radius o f gyration values at each retention volume were not as precise as the corresponding weight-average molecular weights, at room temperature, p recision was better than 2% for a significant portion of the chromatog ram. (C) 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.