Efforts to establish mandated staffing ratios are shortsighted, and, t
hough proponents may have the best intentions, many negative outcomes
would flow from the public airing of this Issue. The institute of Medi
cine concluded in 1996 that there was insufficient quality outcome evi
dence to support the imposition of mandated nurse staffing ratios. The
Massachusetts Nursing Association got legislation introduced in early
1996 which, if passed, would turn over to state lawmakers decisions g
overning nurse staffing in hospitals and other employment settings. Th
ere are high opportunity costs. Staffing regulations (if imposed) woul
d force employers to ignore the dynamic interactions of economic, tech
nology, capital, and labor supply variables, and thus needlessly impos
e the effect of increased labor costs on hospitals, taxpayers and nurs
es themselves. Chance for passage of this highly controversial legisla
tion is unlikely, but the expenditure of political chips (and the loss
of credibility) will increase the difficulty of obtaining a hearing f
rom legislators the next time a nursing issue comes up.