While under some circumstances information sharing in oligopoly may be
beneficial, the literature ignores the possibility of strategic infor
mation sharing by assuming verifiability of data. I endogenize the inc
entives for truthful information sharing and prove that if firms have
the ability to send misleading information, they will always do so. To
overcome this problem I introduce a (costly) mechanism through which
the firm will, in its own best interest, reveal the true value of its
private information, even though outside verification is impossible. I
show that in some cases benefits from information sharing exceed the
signalling costs, while in other cases the reverse is true. The fact t
hat I model a two-sided signalling enables me to mitigate the signalli
ng-cost problem. Rather than burning money, oligopolistic rivals may e
xchange transfer payments, thereby significantly reducing signalling c
osts.