Based on a survey of executives in more than 400 U.S. firms, this arti
cle assesses corporate efforts on both workplace flexibility and manag
ing diversity. Although the survey data reveal considerable progress o
n both fronts, there is cause for concern, sav the authors. Most compa
nies, Hall and Parker argue, are missing an opportunity to use workpla
ce flexibility to promote the organization's strategic objectives. Too
many managers still consider flexibility initiatives as a specialized
human resource activity, as opposed to an element of organization and
work design and a way to tap employees' full potential for creativity
and commitment. Moreover, companies generally house responsibility fo
r flexibility in low-level human resource positions. Ironically, even
though managers may view flexibility more as an employee benefit than
a strategic advantage for the firm, it appears that the organization s
till benefits more than does the individual, since flexibility feature
s allow the employee to remain at work while meeting family responsibi
lities. Still, say the authors, organizations fail to benefit (strateg
ically) as much as they could. An organization that provides workplace
flexibility in the right way (to empower employees) is not just provi
ding an employee-friendly environment; it is also creating a more comp
etitive learning organization.