AN AUDIT OF ANTIASTHMATIC DRUG INHALATION TECHNIQUE AND UNDERSTANDING

Citation
Cr. Kumana et al., AN AUDIT OF ANTIASTHMATIC DRUG INHALATION TECHNIQUE AND UNDERSTANDING, The Journal of asthma, 30(4), 1993, pp. 263-269
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System",Allergy
Journal title
ISSN journal
02770903
Volume
30
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
263 - 269
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-0903(1993)30:4<263:AAOADI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Inhaled rather than oral antiasthmatic therapy is accepted as more adv antageous but depends on patient technique and understanding. In 74 as thmatic outpatients, technique using metered-dose inhaler (MDI) was po or; in 56 patients inhaling beta-agonist, the mean peak expiratory flo w rate (PEFR) increase was only 15 L/min (6%) greater than in 18 contr ols, p < 0.05, 95% confidence intervals 2-27 L/min or 2-11%. Tilting t he head back and actuation ''stopping'' inspiration produced the least favorable PEFR responses; taken together, regression analysis yielded a statistically significant negative correlation with absolute or per centage PEFR change (R2 = 0.15; p < 0.02). Patients were unclear about which drugs to inhale as required or regularly. Among 19 patients rea ssessed inhaling beta-agonist, only 8 had baseline PEFR values within 10% of each other during both assessments. In the latter, the mean pos tinhalation PEFR increase was 36 L/min (or 13%) greater than the corre sponding increase (or % change) at first assessment, p = 0.05 (0.08), 95% confidence intervals 0-73 L/min (-2 to 29%). Thus, MDI users shoul d avoid tilting the head back, actuation stopping inhalation, and be m ore aware of prophylactic (steroid) versus symptomatic (beta-agonist) treatment.