G. Luisetto et al., INFLUENCE OF AGING AND MENOPAUSE IN DETERMINING VERTEBRAL AND DISTAL FOREARM BONE LOSS IN ADULT HEALTHY WOMEN, Bone and mineral, 22(1), 1993, pp. 9-25
In order to assess the relative influence of aging and menopause in de
termining the decrease of bone mass in adult women, two groups of norm
al subjects were examined in this retrospective, cross-sectional study
. In group A, bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated at spine (L2-L4
) by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic QDR-1000); in group B, B
MD was measured at the distal forearm by single photon absorptiometry
(SPA) (Osteometer DT 100). Both groups were further divided into two s
ubgroups: A1 and BI included women with the same postmenopausal, but d
ifferent chronological age; A2 and B2 included women with the same chr
onological, but different postmenopausal age. BMD and BMI-corrected BM
D (cBMD) were plotted versus age and years since menopause, respective
ly. Mathematical analysis of the correlation curves between BMD and ch
ronological age showed that the decrease of BMD is very similar at spi
ne and forearm, and is better fitted by a quadratic function. Age-rela
ted fractional bone diminution shows a progressive increase with aging
(at spine: -0.38%/year at 45 years, -0.81%/year at 50, -1.3%/year at
55 and -1.9%/year at 60. At forearm: -0.5%/year at 50 years, - 1.1%/ye
ar at 55 and - 1.68%/year at 60). On the other hand, menopause-related
BMD decrement is very evident during the first year since menopause (
at spine: -8.1%/year; at forearm: -3.4%/year), and progressively decre
ases, according to a logarithmic function. Ten years later, yearly dim
inution of BMD is below 1%/year and 0.4%/year at spine and forearm, re
spectively. At this time, age contributes to determine bone loss for 2
/3 and menopause for 1/3.