We consider three political-economy arguments in favor of a uniform ta
riff rule (UTR). First, if tariffs are determined by lobbying, adoptio
n of a UTR creates a free-rider problem. A tariff resulting from lobby
ing by one sector becomes available to all other sectors. This reduces
incentive for lobbying. Second, if there are imported inputs which ar
e used by import-competing sectors, a UTR leads to a lower level of lo
bbying. Finally, a UTR may tie the hands of a future government expect
ed to favor certain sectors over others, and enhance welfare ex ante.
None of these presents an air-tight case for uniformity.