Bj. Fowers et Fc. Richardson, INDIVIDUALISM AND AGGRESSION - A HERMENEUTIC ANALYSIS OF HUESMANN ANDERON COGNITIVE THEORY OF AGGRESSION, Theory & psychology, 3(3), 1993, pp. 351-374
A number of writers have expressed concern that much psychological the
ory and research may be critically shaped by a 'disguised ideology'. T
his thesis will be explored by examining the tacit ideological underpi
nnings of the cognitive theory of aggression proposed by Huesmann, Ero
n and their colleagues. This work appears to be infused with unacknowl
edged liberal individualist or philosophical liberal assumptions which
portray humans as more or less autonomous, strategic agents seeking t
o achieve pre-given ends. Once these evaluative underpinnings are expo
sed, certain implausibilities and anomalies in this view of aggression
emerge that seem to reflect tensions inherent in the liberal individu
alist interpretation of human action. Restricting the study of violenc
e to rather narrow instrumental categories of human action severely co
nstrains the extent to which unwanted forms of aggression can be under
stood and reduced. Thus, this approach to aggression may inadvertently
reinforce aspects of modern culture that are themselves significant s
ources of unwanted aggression.