Aha. Suliman et al., EFFECTS OF SURFACE-TREATMENT AND BONDING AGENTS ON BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE RESIN TO PORCELAIN, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 70(2), 1993, pp. 118-120
This study evaluated porcelain repair by use of various surface treatm
ents and hydrophilic bonding resins. The surface treatments were air a
brasion (sandblasting), roughening with a diamond, etching with 9.6% h
ydrofluoric acid, and a combination of the latter two methods. A silan
e coupling agent was applied to all porcelain surfaces, and composite
resin was bonded to porcelain with All-Bond 2, Amalgambond, or Clearfi
l Porcelain bonding agents. Shear bond strengths were determined on a
universal testing machine. The most effective surface treatment was th
e combination of diamond roughening and hydrofluoric acid etching, but
it was not significantly better than the other methods. The Clearfil
Porcelain Bond system showed a greater repair strength than the other
two materials but was statistically different only from Amalgambond re
sin.