Ac. York et Jw. Wilcut, INSECTICIDES DO NOT AFFECT COTTON (GOSSYPIUM-HIRSUTUM) RESPONSE TO IMAZAQUIN AND IMAZETHAPYR, Weed science, 41(2), 1993, pp. 269-280
Field and greenhouse experiments evaluated interactions of soil-applie
d insecticides and imazaquin and imazethapyr on growth and development
of cotton. Imazaquin and imazethapyr were applied PPI at 0 to 6 and 0
to 16 g ae ha-1, respectively, in the greenhouse (plus a no-insectici
de control), and 0 to 72 g ha-1 in the field in combination with aldic
arb, disulfoton, and phorate (without a no-insecticide control) applie
d in the seed furrow. Cotton shoot fresh weight in the greenhouse expe
riment decreased linearly as herbicide rates increased. Greater reduct
ions in shoot fresh weight were noted with imazaquin than with imazeth
apyr. Compared with no insecticide, the methylcarbamate insecticide al
dicarb and the organophosphate insecticides disulfoton and phorate did
not affect cotton response to either herbicide. In the field, cotton
injury increased while stand, yield, and maturity decreased as herbici
de rates increased. Delayed maturity was due to a lower percentage of
bolls produced on sympodia from main stem nodes four to nine. Imazaqui
n caused greater injury, greater reductions in stand, greater delays i
n maturity, and lower yields than did imazethapyr. Earlier maturity wa
s noted with aldicarb-treated cotton. Compared with aldicarb, disulfot
on and phorate did not alter cotton response to imazaquin or imazethap
yr.