Rectal compliance has theoretical and practical drawbacks resulting in
wide variation in the reported normal values. Slope of stress-strain
relation, a measure of rectal wall stiffness (Incremental elastic modu
lus; IEM) may be an effective alternative. The aim of this study was t
o compare IEM with rectal compliance during ramp inflation. In a group
of 15 normal adults [Median age 51.5 years (range 31 to 74); 11 femal
e and 4 male], these parameters were assessed at three rates of inflat
ion, using a proctometrogram-catheter-balloon (PCB) complex and endore
ctal ultrasound scanner (7 Mhz; B & K) to measure intrarectal pressure
and radius respectively. IEM had a linear relation with strain (Slope
33.55; R(2) = 0.9815) in contrast to compliance (R(2) = 0.0088). Seri
es elastic component (SEC), a measure of passive viscoelasticity, was
rate independent elasticity [Slope 1.02 (0.98 to 1.15); P = ns] and a
rate dependant viscosity (P = 0.003; One way ANOVA). Both IEM and SEC
were reproducible (R = 0.985; P < 0.01). This study emphasises the imp
ortance of rectal wall viscoelastic evaluation based on stress and str
ain rather than compliance.