Kl. Thorbjornsen et Wm. Dunne, ORIGIN OF A THRUST-RELATED FOLD - GEOMETRIC VS KINEMATIC TESTS, Journal of structural geology, 19(3-4), 1997, pp. 303-319
Geometric tests to determine the origin of fault-related folds are com
mon, but as is typical in structural geology, more than one fold origi
n may yield the final natural geometry. Thus, the results of geometric
tests are usually non-unique. In contrast, kinematic tests of origin,
which employ both geometry and data about deformation, commonly yield
more constrained, if not unique, results. Unfortunately, the necessar
y data collection requires much more work than for a geometric test. I
n this study, the thrust-related Barclay anticline is analyzed both ge
ometrically and kinematically to determine which test is more effectiv
e. Geometric teals, using angular relationships, indicate three possib
le origins: fault-bend, fault-arrest, and break-thrust. For the kinema
tic test, predicted deformations for interlayer and flexural slip, fle
xural flow, simple shear, and bending strains are compared to micro- a
nd mesostructural distributions, solution strain, and finite strain fr
om the anticline. Strain measurements indicate that microscale deforma
tion is uniformly distributed through the structure and is lithificati
on-dominated. The microscale deformation does not match kinematic pred
ictions, and did not accommodate fold formation. Fold growth was achie
ved primarily through layer-parallel slip restricted mostly to the for
elimb and absent in the hinge, which eliminates fault-bend and fault-a
rrest origins that require material transport from forelimb to backlim
b. The Barclay anticline is therefore interpreted to be a break-thrust
structure. Interestingly, a suite of contraction faults in the foreli
mb and hinge indicates material transport from forelimb to backlimb. S
uch transport has been discounted for break-thrust folds. The most imp
ortant result of this study is that a kinematic test was a necessary s
tep for distinguishing fold origin. Geometric testing alone was insuff
icient. Given that the Barclay anticline has geometric characteristics
typical of many thrust-related folds, kinematic testing appears neces
sary to determine their structural origin. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science L
td.