M. Leunig et al., TUMOR-LOCALIZATION KINETICS OF PHOTOFRIN AND 3 SYNTHETIC PROPHYRINOIDS IN AN AMELANOTIC MELANOMA OF THE HAMSTER, British Journal of Cancer, 68(2), 1993, pp. 225-234
In this study the localisation of porphyrinoid photosensitisers in tum
ours was investigated. To determine if tumour selectivity results from
a preferential uptake or prolonged retention of photosensitisers, int
ravital fluorescence microscopy and chemical extraction were used. Ame
lanotic melanoma (A-Mel-3) were implanted in a skin fold chamber in Sy
rian Golden hamsters. Distribution of the porphyrin mixture Photofrin
and three porphycenes, pure porphyrinoid model compounds, was studied
quantitatively by intravital fluorescence microscopy. Extraction of ti
ssue and blood samples was performed to verify and supplement intravit
al microscopic results. Photofrin accumulated in melanomas reaching a
maximum tumour:skin tissue ratio of 1.7:1. Localisation of the differe
nt porphycenes was found to be highly tumour selective (3.2:1), anti-t
umour selective (0.2:1), and non-selective (1:1) with increasing polar
ity of the porphycenes. The two non-tumour selective porphycenes had d
istinctly- accelerated serum and tissue kinetics; serum halflife times
being as short as 1 min. The specific localisation of the slowly dist
ributed, tumour selective photosensitisers, occurred exclusively durin
g the distribution from serum and uptake into tissues. For the most se
lective porphycene. the tumour selection process had a halflife of 260
+/- 150 min and led to a strongly fluorescent tumour edge edema. Accu
mulation of porphyrines by the amelanotic melanoma (A-Mel-3) can be at
tributed to an enhanced uptake rate for lipophilic molecules in this s
ubcutaneously growing neoplasm. The slow distribution of the two tumou
r specific photosensitisers and the strong fluorescence of these hydro
phobic molecules in the tumour compartment with a high water content i
ndicate a carrier role of serum proteins in the selection process. Enh
anced permeability of the tumour vasculature to macromolecules appears
to be the most probable reason for the tumour selectivity of these tw
o sensitisers.