This article takes stock of one aspect of psychologically based empiri
cal jurisprudence-its role in legal change over the last decade. It as
sesses the ways in which the increased involvement of psychology in th
e legal process has influenced and affected the nature and direction o
f legal change. While acknowledging very real and tangible successes,
it also identifies several problem areas, ones whose significance may
grow in light of an increasingly unsympathetic, conservative judiciary
. The direction of psychology and law, as an applied academic discipli
ne, and the future of empirically based legal change are also examined
.