Background. General anesthetics modify airway responsiveness by severa
l mechanisms, including direct effects on airway smooth muscle and red
uctions in neural reflex activity. Halothane has been shown to reduce
responsiveness through both of these mechanisms. The airway effects of
barbiturates are controversial, and the effects of propofol are unkno
wn. Methods: To compare the direct effects of halothane, thiopental, a
nd propofol in vivo, canine peripheral airways were constricted with t
wo stimuli, histamine and hypocapnia, which are thought to directly co
ntract smooth muscle. The authors then investigated the role of ATP-se
nsitive potassium (K(ATP)) channels as a mechanism for attenuating the
se responses. Basenji-Greyhound (BG) dogs were anesthetized with eithe
r halothane (1.5 MAC), thiopental (7.5 mg.kg-1 . min-1 intravenously)
plus fentanyl (25 mug intravenously every 20-30 min), or propofol (0.6
mg . kg-1 . min-1 intravenously). A wedged bronchoscope technique was
used to measure peripheral airway resistance (R(p)). After a stable b
aseline was obtained, dose-response curves to histamine (50, 100, or 2
00 mug intravenous bolus) or hypocapnia (0% CO2 for 2 min with 100, 20
0, or 400 ml/min collateral flow) were constructed. On separate occasi
ons, the same sublobar segments were pretreated with glibenclamide (2
mg/ml aerosol), a K(ATP) channel blocker, and dose-response curves to
hypocapnia were repeated. Results. Dose-response curves to histamine w
ere similar during all three anesthetics. Halothane decreased airway r
esponsiveness to hypocapnia, compared with either thiopental or propof
ol (P < 0.05). Pretreatment with glibenclamide abolished the effect of
halothane on hypocapnia-induced airway constriction. Conclusions: The
se results indicate that propofol afforded no benefit over thiopental
or halothane in reducing peripheral airway responsiveness. Furthermore
, the beneficial effects of halothane in reducing responsiveness to hy
pocapnia appear to be mediated by the opening of K(ATP) channels.