A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF WHEY HYDROLYSATE AND WHEY-PREDOMINANT FORMULAS - HOW WELL DO INFANTS ACCEPT AND TOLERATE THEM

Citation
B. Hauser et al., A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF WHEY HYDROLYSATE AND WHEY-PREDOMINANT FORMULAS - HOW WELL DO INFANTS ACCEPT AND TOLERATE THEM, Clinical pediatrics, 32(7), 1993, pp. 433-437
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00099228
Volume
32
Issue
7
Year of publication
1993
Pages
433 - 437
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9228(1993)32:7<433:ACOWHA>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Whey hydrolysate formulas are a recent and important innovation in inf ant feeding. This study compared clinical tolerance and acceptability of a whey hydrolysate formula (WH) with those of a whey-predominant fo rmula (WF) in 45 infants. Four infants (16%) who refused to drink WH f ormula were eliminated from the study. Mean volume intake was signific antly lower for WH (120 mL/kg/day) than for WF (147 mL/kg/day; P < .00 1). Consequently, mean caloric intake was also significantly different : 80 kcal/kg/day (WF) vs 97 kcal/kg/day (WF; P < .001). Nevertheless, weight gain from birth to 13 weeks of age was nearly identical in both groups (171% for WH vs 178% for WF). No significant differences were noted in duration of feeding, number of pauses during feeding, number of stools per day, or number of regurgitations per day. The lower rate of caloric intake and the dropout rate of 16% for WH raise questions about the use of WH formula in normal infants, as has become the case in some Western European regions.