The phenomenon of ''motion capture'' has been demonstrated by presenti
ng, one after the other, two identical Kanizsa squares spatially separ
ated and superimposed on a regular matrix of dots. For appropriate tem
poral intervals, one illusory square is seen to jump from one location
to the other and the dots in it appear to move with it even though th
ey are physically stationary. The standard explanation of the effect i
s that motion signals from the subjective figure are spontaneously att
ributed to the static elements laying on it. We have found, however, t
hat if alternative removal of right-angle sectors (required to obtain
apparent motion of the illusory square) is not accompanied by alternat
ive appearance and disappearance of a few dots, motion capture does no
t occur. This suggests that the basic mechanism underlying capture is
not the motion of the subjective figure per se, but the spreading of m
otion signals arising from those texture elements that alternately go
on and off between frames. On the other hand, subjective contours do p
lay a role by confining the spreading of motion signals to the texture
elements located on the figure.