Purpose: To compare the surface roughness produced by various implant
curets on titanium implant abutment surfaces. Materials and Methods: E
ach of six titanium implants was divided into four quadrants, three ex
perimental and an untreated control surface. The three experimental su
rfaces were instrumented with a gold platinum curet, an unreinforced r
esin curet, or a reinforced resin curet. Two implants were assigned to
each of the following treatments: 128, 256 or 512 scaling strokes wit
hin a 4 mm wide area. Photographs were taken of the surfaces with a sc
anning electron microscope at approximately x500 magnification and cla
ssified by six investigators according to surface roughness. Results:
The surfaces were different at 8 and 16 years with P < 0.01 and P < 0.
0005, respectively. At 8 years, the surface roughness was significant
between the treatments in the following ascending order: untreated, un
reinforced resin curet, reinforced resin curet and gold platinum curet
. Significant roughness was observed for surfaces treated by only the
gold platinum curet and the reinforced resin curet at 16 years. The go
ld platinum curet created the roughest surface P < 0.0006.