Wt. Mcgee et al., ACCURATE PLACEMENT OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER TRIAL, Critical care medicine, 21(8), 1993, pp. 1118-1123
Objectives: a) To define the frequency of dangerous (intracardiac) cen
tral venous catheter placement in a multicenter study of large communi
ty hospital intensive care units (ICUs) and to evaluate physician resp
onses to this finding. b) To validate right atrial electrocardiography
as a technique to assure adherence with recent Food and Drug Administ
ration (FDA) guidelines regarding the location of central venous cathe
ter tips. c) To conduct a literature review of vascular cannulation an
d its associated potentially lethal complications. Design: Prospective
, randomized, blinded, multicenter study. Setting: Multidisciplinary I
CUs in five large community teaching hospitals. Patients: Consecutive
patients (n = 112) who required a central venous catheter by either in
ternal jugular vein or subclavian vein at four separate hospitals were
assessed using 30-cm catheters. Consecutive patients (n = 50) in a fi
fth hospital who subsequently required a central venous catheter via t
he internal jugular vein or subclavian vein route were prospectively r
andomized to receive a 20-cm central venous catheter with either conve
ntional surface-landmark guidance, or with the right atrial electrocar
diography-guided technique. Main Outcome Measures: a) Occurrence rate
of malpositioned central venous catheters. b) Ability of right atrial
electrocardiography to aid in the accurate placement of central venous
catheters. Results: a) Using conventional placement techniques with a
30-cm catheter, 53 (47%) of 112 initial central venous catheter place
ments resulted in location of the catheter tip within the heart. Cathe
ter tips were not repositioned to locations outside the right atrium a
fter this finding was identified on initial postprocedure films. b) Us
ing the right atrial electrocardiography technique to place 20-cm cent
ral venous catheters resulted in no catheter tip locations within the
heart (0/25) vs. 14 (56%) of 25 (p < .0001) intracardiac placements us
ing conventional techniques. c) The literature suggests that serious m
echanical complications of central venous catheterization, although un
common, are associated with a high mortality rate. Deaths are associat
ed with intracardiac placement. Conclusions: a) The FDA guidelines reg
arding catheter tip location (catheter tip should not be in the right
atrium) have not been widely publicized. b) The average safe insertion
depth for a central venous catheter from the left or right internal j
ugular vein or subclavian vein is 16.5 cm for the majority of adult pa
tients; a central venous catheter should not be routinely inserted to
a depth of >20 cm. Catheters longer than this size are rarely needed,
and potentially dangerous. Catheter tip location is important to docum
ent following central venous catheter insertion. Thirty-centimeter cen
tral venous catheters should not be used when accessing the central ci
rculation via internal jugular or subclavian veins. c) Right atrial el
ectrocardiography is a technique that assures initial tip position out
side the heart in accordance with FDA guidelines. This technique would
virtually eliminate the major risk of death (i.e., cardiac perforatio
n) associated with this procedure. d) Recently available, 15- and 16-c
m central venous catheters have significant potential to minimize intr
acardiac placement of central venous catheters by either the internal
jugular or subclavian vein route and may become the standard of care.