'Market testing' has been hailed by the Government as an opportunity t
o bring enterprise into the management of the civil service. But what
about the previous attempts to do that through setting up Executive Ag
encies? Should we assume that they should be consigned to the dustbin
of failed government reforms? This article suggests that market testin
g is based on a fundamentally different approach to public management
and speculates as to whether it has been introduced for reasons of car
eer opportunism or because of a reasoned critique of what has been ach
ieved through past approaches to management change. If there has been
a reasoned critique, it has not been shared with the citizens of this
country or their representatives in Parliament.