THE ERICA IOP-5 STORM .1. ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION

Citation
Rj. Reed et al., THE ERICA IOP-5 STORM .1. ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION, Monthly weather review, 121(6), 1993, pp. 1577-1594
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00270644
Volume
121
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1577 - 1594
Database
ISI
SICI code
0027-0644(1993)121:6<1577:TEIS.A>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The ERICA IOP 5 storm was the third strongest cyclone observed during the three-month Experiment on Rapidly Intensifying Cyclones over the A tlantic (ERICA) and the least successfully predicted by the operationa l models. This paper documents the storm development with use of nearl y all available observational data and presents the results of a simul ation of the storm carried out by the Pennsylvania State University-NC AR Mesoscale Model MM4. The observations reveal that the storm formed in two stages: a first stage in which a weak, eastward-moving upper-le vel trough over the Gulf states excited the growth of two disturbances over the Gulf Stream, and a second stage in which a rapidly moving, m oderately intense short-wave trough from the north-central states inte racted with the more northerly of the two disturbances, producing rapi d intensification. Maximum deepening rates were 11 mb (6 h)-1 and 33 m b (24 h)-1. At the mature stage a thermal gradient of 7-degrees-C (35 km)-1 was observed near the surface by a low-flying research aircraft that traversed the occluded frontal zone. A full-physics simulation, c arried out on a movable 30-km grid embedded within a 90-km fixed grid, closely reproduced the storm development, as verified by surface ship and buoy observations, flight level and dropsonde data from research aircraft, and satellite infrared and microwave imagery. Sensitivity te sts reported in a companion paper revealed that the development was hi ghly sensitive to condensation heating and moderately sensitive to sur face energy fluxes, grid size, and the location of the Gulf Stream. Th e companion paper also addresses the question of why in this case the MM4 outperformed the operational models of the National Meteorological Center.