D. Shapiro et al., AMBULATORY STRESS PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY - THE STUDY OF COMPENSATORY AND DEFENSIVE COUNTERFORCES AND CONFLICT IN A NATURAL SETTING, Psychosomatic medicine, 55(3), 1993, pp. 309-323
Thirty years ago, Donald Oken raised basic questions about psychophysi
ological research strategies for the study of the ''psychological stre
ss response'' in the laboratory. Is it possible to simulate in the lab
oratory the situations one normally encounters? Do laboratory stimuli
provoke affective arousal? Are different classes of stress stimuli ass
ociated with specific physiological response patterns? How do one's ch
aracteristic ''defenses'' and coping styles modulate one's responses?
This paper describes a novel ambulatory research strategy in which the
laboratory is moved into the natural setting. The advantages of this
strategy are exemplified in studies of paramedics in whom 24-hour reco
rdings were made of ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate. The ambu
latory physiological data were then related to information about speci
fic work location and subjective ratings of stress made in a diary at
the time of each reading, objective assessments of the different stres
sful situations encountered, and the role of individual differences in
anger expression and defensiveness in modulating these relationships.
The findings illustrate the ability of real-life stressors to bring o
ut relationships not typically obtained in the laboratory. Moreover, t
he natural setting permits individuals to respond to behavioral challe
nges using their preferred mode of coping with stress, as opposed to t
he constraints imposed on them in the laboratory. This research strate
gy has also helped uncover the significance of conflict about the expr
ession of hostility, rather than hostility per se, as a key factor in
the ''stress response.''