Aims and Background. Suboptimal sensitivity is currently reported for
Pap test in screening for cervical cancer. Colposcopy is known to be m
ore sensitive than cytology but its use as a screening test Is not pos
sible due to costs and complexity. Screening by cervicography has been
suggested as a compromise being less costly and feasible. The present
study evaluates the feasibility of screening by cervicography and cer
vicoscopy (naked eye examination of the cervix after acetic acid lavag
e) on a consecutive screening series. Methods: Cervicography and cervi
coscopy were performed by the smear taker in subjects consecutively at
tending a screening clinic. Women with abnormal cytology (atypia or mo
re severe lesion) and/or abnormal cervicography or cervicoscopy (aceto
white lesion) underwent colposcopic assessment. The three screening me
thods were compared according to positivity rate, CIN 2-3 detection ra
te and positive predictive value. Results: 2105 consecutive subjects w
ere screened. Positivity rate was 3.8 %, 15.3 % or 25.4 % for cytology
, cervicography or cervicoscopy, respectively, 486 of 555 women attend
ed the assessment phase, 281 directed biopsies were performed and 8 CI
N 2-3 lesions were detected. Cytology, cervicography and cervicoscopy,
detected 5.5, or 7 of 8 CIN 2-3 lesions, respectively. The positive p
redictive value was 0 % for cytologic atypia, 25 % for cytologic SIL,
1.75 % for cervicography and 2.05 % for cervicoscopy. Detecting one CI
N 2-3 lesion at cytology cost $ 5,543. The cost per each additional cy
tologically negative CIN 2-3 lesion detected at cervicography or cervi
coscopy was $ 12,947 or $ 3,916, respectively. Conclusions: The study
confirms the limited sensitivity of cytology for CIN 2-3. The associat
ion of cervicography was not cost effective. Cervicoscopy was poorly s
pecific but increased the detection rate of CIN 2-3 at relatively low
costs. Cervicoscopy is worth further evaluation as a screening test.