Rg. Chen et al., A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) AND GH-RELEASING HORMONE(1-29)-NH2 FOR STIMULATION OF GROWTH IN CHILDREN WITH GH DEFICIENCY, Acta paediatrica, 82, 1993, pp. 32-36
In this study, 60 patients with proven growth hormone deficiency (GHD)
of hypothalamic origin were randomized into three equal groups, and r
eceived growth hormone-releasing hormone(1-29)-NH2 (GHRH(1-29)-NH2), 3
0 or 60 mug/kg/day, or growth hormone (GH), 0.1 IU/kg/day, for 6 month
s. There were no significant differences in growth between the two gro
ups given GHRH(1-29)-NH2, but growth in the GH group was significantly
better than in the other two groups (p < 0.01). Mean height velocitie
s at 6 months were 9.2, 9.3 and 14.6 cm/year for the three groups, res
pectively. Plasma GHRH concentrations increased steadily over the 6-mo
nth treatment period, with higher levels in the group on the higher do
se. During GHRH(1-29)-NH2 treatment, serum concentrations of insulin-l
ike growth factor I rose initially, but then fell to values similar to
those before treatment. No GH antibodies were detected, but all 20 pa
tients on high-dose GHRH(1-29)-NH2 and 19 of 20 patients on low-dose G
HRH(1-29)-NH2 developed GHRH antibodies. These had almost disappeared
by 9 months after stopping treatment. There was no correlation between
antibody titres and increase in height. No serious side-effects were
seen, but three patients receiving GHRH(1-29)-NH2 reported mild irrita
tion at the injection site. These results from the continuous infusion
of GHRH(1-29)-NH2 over 6 months suggest that this treatment, or the r
elated use of a depot preparation, is unlikely to be as effective as G
H for the promotion of growth in GHD.