Scientists routinely employ metatheoretic principles, explicit discuss
ion of which typically occurs in times of intense controversy, theoret
ical crisis, scientific revolution, and entry into a new domain. The w
ritings of philosophers, including their disagreements, are often help
ful in such circumstances. Whether knowledge of formal metatheory help
s us in doing ''normal science'' is researchable. Much scientific thin
king is of poor quality, and it could be improved by explicit metatheo
retical education. Clinical practice and training programs should emph
asize rational skepticism, respect for evidence, objectivity, and quan
titative thinking. Because the relation between principles and success
is probabilistic, metatheoretical research should implement the case
study method by formal actuarial procedures.