This paper examines bidding in auctions for state highway construction
contracts, in order to determine whether bid rigging occurred. Detect
ion of collusion is possible because of limited participation in the c
ollusive scheme. Collusion did not take the form of a bid rotation sch
eme. Instead, several ring members bid on most jobs. One was a serious
bidder, and the others submitted phony higher bids. The bids of nonca
rtel firms, as well as their rank distribution, were related to cost m
easures. In contrast, the rank distribution of higher cartel bids was
unrelated to similar cost measures and differed from that of the low c
artel bid.