Rl. Remillard et al., COMPARISON OF KITTENS FED QUEENS MILK WITH THOSE FED MILK REPLACERS, American journal of veterinary research, 54(6), 1993, pp. 901-907
Fifteen 2-week-old kittens were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 milk treat
ment groups as the sole source of nutrition for 4 weeks: queen's milk,
commercially available kitten milk replacer (CMR), and an experimenta
l milk replacer (EXP). Kittens fed queen's milk suckled ad libitum, wh
ereas CMR- and EXP-fed kittens were tube-fed every 6 hours. kittens we
re weaned at 6 weeks of age and were fed a feline growth diet ad libit
um for an additional 4 weeks. Kittens were examined at 2, 4, 6, 8 and
10 weeks of age; the procedure included an ophthalmic examination and
blood sample collection for CBC and serum biochemical and amino acid a
nalyses. Kittens fed CMR and EXP diets had weight gain greater than th
at for queen's milk-fed kittens. The kittens fed CMR, however, had dia
rrhea throughout most of the milk-feeding trial and developed diffuse
anterior and posterior lens opacification and vacuolation at the poste
rior Y-sutures. The lens opacities noticed in the kittens during the m
ilk treatments resolved to a residual perinuclear halo, and a few inci
pient cortical opacities were observed by the end of the growth diet-f
eeding period. Serum arginine concentration was significantly (P less-
than-or-equal-to 0.05) lower in the CMR-fed kittens, but was not diffe
rent during the growth diet-feeding period. We concluded that the EXP
diet supported normal growth in 2- to 6-week-old kittens; CMR supporte
d normal kitten growth rate, but resulted in diarrhea and cataract for
mation; and serum amino acid data indicated that low arginine concentr
ation may have been related to the CMR-induced cataract formation.