We examine analysts' earnings forecasts for a sample of takeover targe
ts and document that the announcement-month forecasts are systematical
ly revised upward, supporting the hypothesis that a takeover announcem
ent conveys favorable information about the target firm. In addition,
we find that abnormal forecast revisions of future stand-alone earning
s are significantly greater for targets with low Tobin's q-ratios rela
tive to targets with high q-ratios, lending further support to the inf
ormation hypothesis. Finally, we provide evidence that managerial resi
stance to the takeover does not destroy value. Our results are in dire
ct contrast to Pound (1988).